Is this textualism?

Michael Greiner
4 min readMay 14, 2019
President Ronald Reagan with the future Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1986. By Ronald Reagan Presidential Library — https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/archives/photographs/large/c35696-12.jpg, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=70174808

Clarence Thomas reveals his hypocrisy

Clarence Thomas prides himself on his adherence to the original text of the Constitution. Called “textualism,” the idea is that courts must rely on what the Constitution specifically says. Where it is silent, the Court cannot superimpose its opinion.

In Lewis v. Casey Thomas wrote

“It is a bedrock principle of…

--

--

Michael Greiner

Mike is an Assistant Professor of Management for Legal and Ethical Studies at Oakland U. Mike combines his scholarship with practical experience in politics.